Skip to content
Synergy Health
A woman with glasses taking notes at a meeting room table while colleagues talk in the background
All posts

Thought Leadership

The Manager Squeeze in NZ & Aust Workplaces

Brad Norris · 9 November 2026 · 3 min read

What we're seeing in New Zealand and Australian workplaces | Synergy Health

The pattern across sectors

Economic pressure always lands somewhere, and in most organisations it lands on frontline and operational teams first. People are absorbing the pressures of demanding customers, tighter resources and constant change every day, and their managers are absorbing it from them. With a sharpening focus on psychosocial risk, this is now a board-level question, not just an HR one.

The manager squeeze

22%: Manager engagement globally, down from 27% in one year (Gallup 2026).

75%: Of managers report experiencing stress and burnout right now.

90%: Say supporting their team through challenging life issues is a major part of the role.

5 hours: Per week spent providing emotional support, for half of all managers.

For the first time on record, managers are no more engaged than the people they lead. The 'engagement premium' that once came with the role is gone.

Why another unstructured wellbeing initiative won't fix it

Decades of top-down programs have quietly built a 'culture of expectation': engagement is something done to people, not by them. People without a personal framework default to external blame (the workload, the system, the manager), and managers burn energy fixing surface complaints while the real driver, what's actually being compromised for each person, stays hidden.

What actually shifts it: three things we've learnt

1. Built for your people, not the average.

The average employee doesn't exist, and programs built for nobody in particular get good sign-up numbers at launch, then silence. Engagement without relevance doesn't last. Interventions need to reflect your brand, your language and the real issues your teams face.

2. Shared ownership, not another top-down program.

People often lack a clear understanding of what personally engages them, which gives change, engagement and psychosocial programs a blind spot: one person's lack of 'job clarity' is another person's 'autonomy'. When each person identifies what genuinely drives them, engagement stops being something done to people and becomes something they own with you.

3. Personalised strategies, in the moment they're needed.

Population data is a diagnostic, not a strategy. Each individual needs support built around their specific pressures, like how to handle a difficult conversation or navigate a change that affects their role, available when the situation arises rather than in a workshop six weeks later.

Want this for your people?

We listen first, then show you what your program could look like.